HEFT7 Let’s talk
Case studies

Case Study 01

Transforming a network towards lasting profitability

Rebuilding the business model of a premium retail chain in formal restructuring

Location economics, leases, the offer, inventory, brand, e-commerce and the operating model were redesigned as one coherent recovery programme.

A selected transformation experience underlying HEFT7. The project predates HEFT7 and was led by the founder in the role of Transformation & Restructuring Director.

Key elements of the project

  • 5 yearsP&L per location
  • ~100processes mapped
  • −28%reduction in the chain's floor space
  • 13large stores analysed in the model
  • E-commercenew channel launched
Premium furniture store undergoing transformation — HEFT7 case study hero image

Illustrative image. It does not show a store covered by the project.

01

Situation

A Central European premium brand in the furniture and interiors sector entered formal court restructuring after a sharp deterioration in liquidity and operating results.

The company had historically operated 23 locations, but by the time the project began the chain had already been reduced to seven large-format stores, each exceeding 1,000 m². At an earlier stage the company had generated multi-million revenues and employed a team of significant operational scale.

The business model was under pressure from several directions at once. The company had lost its credit line, faced the need to redeem bonds and to pay a significant contractual penalty. Additional burdens were exchange-rate movements, the loss of part of its export markets, problems at one of its key counterparties and rigid lease terms.

Sales in the first half of one of the key periods fell by more than 20% year on year. At the same time the company held a significant level of inventory, and the liabilities covered by the restructuring involved more than 100 creditors.

  • 23locations in the company's history
  • 7stores over 1,000 m² at the start of the project
  • >20%fall in sales year on year in the first half of one of the key periods
  • >100creditors covered by the restructuring

02

Problem

The profitability of the remaining stores was also deteriorating quickly.

  • 11% → <1%store result as a share of sales within about 18 months
  • ~20%rent and service charges as a share of sales
  • −5 p.p.of gross margin over several years

The store result fell from around 11% of sales to below 1% within about 18 months. Rent and service charges were approaching 20% of sales, and gross margin had fallen by about 5 percentage points over several years. Some locations were unprofitable.

However, the problem was not only about costs.

Large stores required wide display and a high level of stocking. Excess inventory froze capital and led to frequent promotions. Promotions eroded margin and weakened the premium positioning. A deteriorating perception of the brand reduced sales per square metre, which in turn deepened the problem of high, rigid rent costs.

How store profitability deteriorated
Offer and capitalLarge format. Excess inventory.Wide display required stock and tied up capital.
Margin pressureFrequent discounts eroded margin and premium positioning.
Leases and salesRigid costs. Weaker sales.Lease obligations did not shrink along with revenue.
Cost pressurePremises costs absorbed an ever-larger share of revenue.
Store resultFalling profitability

Improving profitability required linked changes in store format, the offer, inventory and lease terms.

At the same time some suppliers expected prepayments, which limited the ability to refresh the offer. The architects' channel — important in the premium segment — was losing significance, and online sales remained insufficiently developed.

Cutting costs alone would therefore only reduce the scale of the existing problem, without removing its sources.

"Cutting costs alone may only create a smaller version of the same problem."

03

Diagnosis

The project began with an analysis of the business economics.

Five years of P&L were analysed for every location, covering sales, cost of goods, gross margin, rent, service charges, salaries, marketing and store result. The analysis showed large differences in profitability between individual stores and a concentration of the result in single locations.

In parallel we assessed the level and structure of inventory, actual delivery lead times, the economics of working with suppliers, dependence on imports, store floor space relative to potential sales, brand positioning, the role of the architects' and B2B channel, service standards, the reporting system, CRM and operating processes.

In the inventory area we determined the level justified by the scale of sales and delivery lead times. The surplus was significant, and part of the stock was slow-moving, incomplete or very old.

The diagnosis showed that the company did not need a single corrective action, but a rebuild of interdependent elements of the model.

04

Direction of the transformation

On the basis of the diagnosis, eight key decisions were defined.

  1. 01

    Brand repositioning

    The brand was to move away from the image of "premium, but constantly discounted" towards a more coherent, curated premium positioning.

  2. 02

    Change of formats

    The plan assumed a move away from very large stores towards formats of several hundred square metres, plus smaller temporary and pop-up formats.

  3. 03

    Rebuilding the offer

    A broad and inconsistent range was to be replaced by a narrower, deeper and more selective offer.

  4. 04

    New suppliers and a multi-brand model

    New partner brands and suppliers were to join the offer and, in the longer term, a higher-margin own brand was to play a larger role.

  5. 05

    E-commerce as part of the new model

    The online channel was to stop being an add-on to the physical network and become one of the main pillars of sales. Stores were to play a greater role in experience, advice and conversion.

  6. 06

    New lease economics

    The model provided for a reduction in floor space and more flexible rent structures, including progressive rent and turnover rent.

  7. 07

    Releasing capital from inventory

    Surplus stock was to be reduced, and new purchasing rules and stocking limits were to be tied to sales and seasonality.

  8. 08

    Rebuilding the operating model

    The new model was to run on store P&L, KPIs, CRM, clearly defined processes, accountability and management standards.

05

Scope of work

Location economics and portfolio

We carried out a P&L analysis per store and assessed the break-even point (BEP) and return on investment (ROI), format sizes, space productivity and the potential of individual locations.

Leases and negotiations with landlords

We conducted direct negotiations on reducing floor space, lease terms, short-term and long-term rent reductions, financial support for store refurbishment and more flexible rent models.

Range and suppliers

We redesigned the structure of the offer, prepared a multi-brand model and built new models of cooperation with European partner brands on new commercial terms.

Inventory and working capital

We identified an excessive level of inventory, applied ABC classification, designed the product structure and architecture, an allocation system and stocking limits, and a policy for liquidating slow-moving stock.

Rebranding and positioning

A new visual identity, logo, brand book, claim, key visual and brand communication system were created.

Store concept and customer experience

We developed a new store concept based on distinct style worlds and zones dedicated to, among others, architects and premium customers.

E-commerce and new channels

We launched a new online sales platform linked to interior design and fit-out services, migrated products, introduced the offer of new suppliers and developed home staging.

Organisation, systems and execution

About 100 operating processes were mapped, and process owners, schedules, reporting rules, a KPI-based bonus system, CRM requirements and working standards were defined. An ERP-class system was implemented and the data structure was organised for BI.

06

Delivery

Within a few months the project moved from diagnosis and design to actual implementation.

On the organisational side, a map of about 100 processes was created, with assigned owners and launch dates. We developed a daily, weekly and monthly reporting system, store P&L and a bonus system taking into account, among other things, sales, conversion, UPT, ATV and margin.

In parallel, a CRM specification was produced covering the key sales and communication processes.

  • −28%reduction in the chain's floor space
  • Allstores with a renegotiated rent model

On the leasing side, new agreements were signed during the restructuring. In all stores the terms were renegotiated and the rent model was changed. The base rent per square metre was reduced and, alongside long-term rent reductions, short-term reductions were also obtained. The chain's total floor space was reduced by 28%.

Landlords also became financially involved in building the new store concept — their support in financing the refurbishment (refits) of premises was secured.

Paradoxically, the restructuring itself became the guarantee of continued cooperation. Shopping centres were often creditors of the company, and continuing the leases tied creditor to debtor and gave the landlord real influence over the course of the recovery. Proposals were also presented for a further reduction in floor space and a move to progressive rent or turnover rent.

Within a few months a new brand identity, brand book, store concept and new communication solutions were prepared. A new e-commerce platform was also launched, together with the products of new suppliers.

07

Confirmed project results

The project led to the preparation and implementation of the key elements of the new business model. The foundation was a restructuring plan in which business analytics, the lease model, the offer and inventory formed one coherent whole.

The confirmed results include:

Restructuring plan and analytics

  • a restructuring plan prepared by the founder of HEFT7, in which all data had to be consistent and subject to approval in court proceedings;
  • full business analytics within the plan: five-year P&L at location level, analysis of stocking and of the product structure and architecture;
  • a break-even point (BEP) model for new formats and for optimised existing stores;
  • an assessment of return on investment (ROI) in the new model and formats.

Systems, data and operating model

  • implementation of an ERP-class system in which sales, stocking, purchasing and finance worked as communicating vessels;
  • an organised data structure and a BI implementation as the basis of the reporting and KPI system;
  • a new operating model covering about 100 processes.

Leasing

  • renegotiated lease terms and a change of rent model in all stores;
  • a change in rent structure: a lower base rate per m² and renegotiated turnover rent, with marketing and common-area charges kept fixed;
  • short-term and long-term rent reductions;
  • a 28% reduction in the floor space of the whole chain;
  • financial support from landlords for the refurbishment (refits) of stores.

Brand and concept

  • rebranding and remodelling — a new brand architecture;
  • a new store concept, developed in cooperation with an external marketing agency;
  • two brands: the main brand and an outlet brand.

Offer and suppliers

  • a new structure of the offer;
  • new models of cooperation with European partner brands from Estonia, Portugal, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands and Germany — in place of the previous imports from China;
  • new commercial terms with suppliers.

Inventory and working capital

  • an allocation and stocking system based on the product structure and architecture;
  • a model for managing inventory and working capital;
  • identification of surplus inventory and a policy for its liquidation, including through the outlet brand.

E-commerce and new channels

  • a new e-commerce platform combining product sales with interior design and fit-out services;
  • home staging — cooperation with estate agencies and owners of residences in which the brand's products were displayed.

08

Limitations of the project

Full implementation across the chain was not completed.

Delivery took place under formal restructuring, in which key decisions about the assets remained with the court-appointed administrator. A further factor was the later closure of shopping centres during the pandemic.

These circumstances halted the full roll-out of the new concept across the whole chain.

For this reason the case study does not attribute to the project any unconfirmed sales or financial results after the implementation ended.

09

Conclusion

In a restructured retail business, cost reduction alone is not enough if the offer, format, inventory, brand and lease terms remain inconsistent with one another.

Each of these elements affects the others.

A recovery programme should therefore cover, at the same time, location economics, inventory structure, the offer, the sales model, space costs and the way the organisation is managed.

The second lesson concerns governance.

Management takeaway

"A recovery plan is worth only as much as the real decision-making rights that allow it to be implemented."

In a formal restructuring, the question of who takes a decision, who can block it and within what time it can be executed should be part of the programme from day one.

10

Competencies used in the project

  • Business restructuring
  • Retail transformation
  • Location economics
  • P&L and profitability analysis
  • Lease negotiations
  • Working capital
  • Range and suppliers
  • Rebranding and positioning
  • Store concept
  • E-commerce
  • Operating model
  • PMO / TMO

11

The seven HEFT7 disciplines

  1. 01

    Diagnosis

    Five-year P&L per location, analysis of store economics, inventory, suppliers, leases, brand and processes.

  2. 02

    Strategy

    New positioning, smaller formats, a change in the sales model and in the role of e-commerce.

  3. 03

    Design

    New store formats, a multi-brand model, the store concept, the lease model and the operating model.

  4. 04

    Preparation

    Process map, accountabilities, schedules, CRM, KPIs, new lease agreements.

  5. 05

    Implementation

    Rebranding, new e-commerce, new suppliers, lease renegotiations and preparation of the new store concept.

  6. 06

    Measurement

    ERP, data structure and BI, reporting system, store P&L and KPIs built into the new management model.

  7. 07Limited scope

    Stabilisation

    Full stabilisation was not achieved owing to decision-making constraints and external conditions. This became one of the key lessons of the project.

Facing a similar challenge?

If the profitability of a chain is deteriorating, individual cost actions may not be enough.

HEFT7 starts such projects with a diagnosis of the business economics and of the interdependencies between locations, margin, inventory, the offer, leases and the operating model.